by ASA, Inc.
Wednesday, Apr 08, 2026
NBA MVP betting forecast – By ASAwins.com
With the NBA season drawing to a close we hear many sports outlets talking about postseason awards and who specifically is going to be MVP. Let me be upfront with this, I am not a Nikola Jokic super-fan, I’m a basketball guy. In my opinion, the NBA in the 80’s and 90’s was the single greatest sport to watch where winning was everything. This ramble or vent is on how little the so called ‘experts’ talk about or support Jokic as the league’s MVP. I’m a realist and a bettor and I know he’s not going to win this season, but the reality is…he’s the most valuable player in the league and it’s not as close as you think. I’ll explain below with a little help from the computers.
Current 2025-26 season records (near the end of the regular season, ~78-79 games played out of 82):
Oklahoma City Thunder: 62-16 (.795)
San Antonio Spurs: 60-19 (.759)
Denver Nuggets: 51-28 (.646)
Key player stats (per game averages and advanced metrics; all data as of the latest available):
Nikola Jokić (DEN)
PPG: 28.0 | RPG: 12.9 | APG: 10.9 | SPG: 1.4 | TOV: 3.8
PER: 32.3 (elite efficiency)
Win Shares (WS): 14.2 (with WS/48 of .315)
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander (OKC)
PPG: 31.4 | RPG: 4.4 | APG: 6.5 | SPG: 1.4 | TOV: 2.2
PER: 31.0
Win Shares (WS): 15.0 (league leader, WS/48 of .328)
Victor Wembanyama (SAS)
PPG: 24.8 | RPG: 11.5 | APG: 3.1 | SPG: 1.0 | TOV: 2.4 | BPG: 3.1
PER: 29.5
Win Shares (WS): 9.6 (WS/48 of .254)
Simulation Method – Win Shares (WS) is the most direct metric here for estimating a player’s win contribution. It is built from box-score stats (points, rebounds, assists, steals, turnovers) plus defensive contributions, efficiency adjustments, pace, and team context. It is normalized so a replacement-level player contributes ~0 WS. PER provides supporting context on individual efficiency but is already embedded in the WS calculation. The simulation is straightforward and standard for these hypotheticals:
Estimated wins without the star ≈ current team wins − player’s WS (rounded to nearest whole win).
Losses increase by the same amount to keep total games played the same. This assumes the star’s minutes are filled by replacement-level talent (0 WS contribution). It is an estimate—real basketball has lineup synergies, chemistry, and schedule effects that WS approximates but does not perfectly capture. Remaining games (~3–4) have minimal impact given how close we are to the end of the season.
Estimated Records Without the Star Player
Denver Nuggets without Nikola Jokić: ~37-42
Current: 51-28. Subtract Jokić’s 14.2 WS → ~37 wins (losses rise accordingly).
Jokić’s triple-double-level production, historic efficiency (PER 32.3), and massive WS make him the clear engine. Without him the Nuggets would still be a solid playoff-level team thanks to depth, but they drop from a top-3 West seed to a borderline play-in squad.
Current: 51-28. Subtract Jokić’s 14.2 WS → ~37 wins (losses rise accordingly).
Jokić’s triple-double-level production, historic efficiency (PER 32.3), and massive WS make him the clear engine. Without him the Nuggets would still be a solid playoff-level team thanks to depth, but they drop from a top-3 West seed to a borderline play-in squad.
Oklahoma City Thunder without Shai Gilgeous-Alexander: ~47-31
Current: 62-16. Subtract SGA’s 15.0 WS → ~47 wins.
SGA is the league’s WS leader and an MVP-caliber two-way force. The Thunder have excellent supporting pieces and depth, so they would remain a strong playoff team (likely still a top-4 seed in the West), but they lose their offensive engine and defensive versatility, dropping from historic pace to “very good but not elite.”
Current: 62-16. Subtract SGA’s 15.0 WS → ~47 wins.
SGA is the league’s WS leader and an MVP-caliber two-way force. The Thunder have excellent supporting pieces and depth, so they would remain a strong playoff team (likely still a top-4 seed in the West), but they lose their offensive engine and defensive versatility, dropping from historic pace to “very good but not elite.”
San Antonio Spurs without Victor Wembanyama: ~50-29
Current: 60-19. Subtract Wemby’s 9.6 WS → ~50 wins.
Wembanyama’s elite two-way impact (PER 29.5, massive blocks, rebounding, and growing playmaking) is huge, but the Spurs have built real supporting talent around him. Without him they would still contend for a high playoff seed, but they lose the defensive anchor and unique spacing/rim protection that makes their system special.
Current: 60-19. Subtract Wemby’s 9.6 WS → ~50 wins.
Wembanyama’s elite two-way impact (PER 29.5, massive blocks, rebounding, and growing playmaking) is huge, but the Spurs have built real supporting talent around him. Without him they would still contend for a high playoff seed, but they lose the defensive anchor and unique spacing/rim protection that makes their system special.
Bottom line: All three teams would remain competitive without their superstar (thanks to depth and coaching), but each would drop noticeably—most dramatically the Nuggets (Jokić’s WS impact is enormous relative to the team’s margin). These are data-driven estimates grounded in the exact metrics.
There is a good chance Jokic will never win another MVP even if he continues to put up these historical statistics. SGA is going to win again this year, then it will be Wemby for the forseeable future who will probably win multiple years in a row, until the voters get “Wemby-fatigue” and move on from him.
